Here's an interesting interview with Dr. Christopher Longhurst from The Stanford IT doctor is in.
The discussion of standards and interoperability is very good.
-
-
Recent Posts
- Creating an Emacs package: ‘password-menu’
- Introducing elfeed-curate
- Dealing with ClojureScript Cross-build NPM Dependencies
- On Selecting Clojure
- Full Cycle Teams in a FDA regulated setting
- VirtualBox 6.1.x Windows 10 2004 Upgrade Problem Resolution
- 314 Digits of Pi (Python to Clojure)
- Bioimpedance Analysis to Detect Sleep Apnea
- EEG Devices at CES 2020
- Exploring Clojure (and FP vs OOP)
Popular Posts
- Validation of Off-The-Shelf Software Development Tools
- Software Verification vs. Validation
- Bioimpedance Analysis to Detect Sleep Apnea
- Exploring Clojure (and FP vs OOP)
- Creating an Emacs package: ‘password-menu’
- BCI: Brain Computer Interface
- Full Cycle Teams in a FDA regulated setting
- OTS/SOUP Software Validation Strategies
- Introducing elfeed-curate
- Brain Monitoring News
Categories
- .NET (19)
- Agile (11)
- Clojure (4)
- Cloud Computing (5)
- EEG (26)
- Emacs (2)
- EMR (40)
- FDA (36)
- fMRI (2)
- General (32)
- Google (13)
- GUI (4)
- HCI (12)
- Health 2.0 (4)
- HIPAA (4)
- HL7 (8)
- ICG (2)
- Interoperability (40)
- LINQ (2)
- Medical Devices (54)
- Microsoft (27)
- Networking (5)
- Open Source (8)
- ORM (2)
- PHR (18)
- Programming (46)
- Robotics (4)
- Software Quality (21)
- Technology (17)
- Tools (10)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Vista (2)
- Visual Studio (2)
- WCF (3)
Archives
- April 2024
- October 2023
- October 2022
- March 2021
- January 2021
- May 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- January 2019
- August 2018
- July 2018
- March 2018
- September 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- December 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
Blogroll
Sites I Visit
Meta
-
Twitter Updates
- Tweets by bobnadler
Bob,
Great find. Dr. Longhurst has some terrific insight into IT and really gets to the core of some issues we’re tackling in medical informatics. UI design and workflow are clearly of critical importance when it comes to medical device interfaces. It’s very insightful that Dr. Longhurst is so keenly aware of how data entry can directly impact patient health risks. An example he uses is dosing.
From watching this video one really comes away with an appreciation of his efforts to eliminate inefficient paper-based processes and not to eliminate paper.
I often get to work directly with physicians when desinging new systems. Dr. Longhurst is absolutely right that involvement of health providers is tremendously beneficial to system design and ultimately in patient care.